<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Mark Gahagan</title>
	<atom:link href="http://spartanfox.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://spartanfox.com</link>
	<description>Covering Poker, Tech, and Gaming, Op-Ed Style</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2012 23:55:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Epic Madness by change100</title>
		<link>http://spartanfox.com/2012/03/19/epic-madness/#comment-169</link>
		<dc:creator>change100</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2012 23:55:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spartanfox.com/?p=422#comment-169</guid>
		<description>I think all the writers owed payment should ask Annie for a loan. She has a lovely $3 million house in the Hollywood Hills she could certainly borrow against.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think all the writers owed payment should ask Annie for a loan. She has a lovely $3 million house in the Hollywood Hills she could certainly borrow against.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Poker Report Card: Week of February 26, 2012 by Mike Stein</title>
		<link>http://spartanfox.com/2012/03/06/poker-report-card-week-of-february-26-2012/#comment-136</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Stein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2012 01:49:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spartanfox.com/?p=391#comment-136</guid>
		<description>&quot;Overdue Tuesday&quot; was me, though I&#039;m honored to have been mistaken for Kevmath!

This is a good format and writing style for a news summary.  Much more interesting than what any of the more mainstream sites are putting out.  Keep up the good work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Overdue Tuesday&#8221; was me, though I&#8217;m honored to have been mistaken for Kevmath!</p>
<p>This is a good format and writing style for a news summary.  Much more interesting than what any of the more mainstream sites are putting out.  Keep up the good work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Plot Thickens GBT States Professional Player Debt a &#8220;Significant&#8221; Hit Against Buying FTP by danm</title>
		<link>http://spartanfox.com/2012/02/02/the-plot-thickens/#comment-92</link>
		<dc:creator>danm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 11:04:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spartanfox.com/?p=350#comment-92</guid>
		<description>&gt;&gt; Well, so long as Full Tilt is in Tiltware/Pocket Kings hands &lt;&lt;

And therein lies the problem ... it is currently in the DOJ&#039;s hands. At least on legal US paper.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;&gt; Well, so long as Full Tilt is in Tiltware/Pocket Kings hands &lt;&lt;</p>
<p>And therein lies the problem &#8230; it is currently in the DOJ&#039;s hands. At least on legal US paper.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Full Tilt Poker Sale Inches Closer  Sale Not Done, Despite Reaction  by dan michalski</title>
		<link>http://spartanfox.com/2011/09/30/full-tilt-poker-sale-inches-closer/#comment-63</link>
		<dc:creator>dan michalski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 05:58:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spartanfox.com/?p=260#comment-63</guid>
		<description>&quot;career cynics&quot;? lol ... i&#039;ll have to add that to the resume!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;career cynics&#8221;? lol &#8230; i&#8217;ll have to add that to the resume!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Embedded in the Poker Media: Day 2 EPL Pro/Am by MattCWaldron</title>
		<link>http://spartanfox.com/2011/08/08/embedded-in-the-poker-media-day-2-epl-proam/#comment-59</link>
		<dc:creator>MattCWaldron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2011 18:48:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spartanfox.com/?p=191#comment-59</guid>
		<description>Mark -- love the funny, raw stuff.  Keep it up and good luck with the Epic league happenings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark &#8212; love the funny, raw stuff.  Keep it up and good luck with the Epic league happenings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on WSOP Coverage You Have to See by Rob Chapman</title>
		<link>http://spartanfox.com/2011/06/13/wsop-coverage-you-have-to-see/#comment-38</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Chapman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2011 07:22:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spartanfox.com/?p=163#comment-38</guid>
		<description>Well crap, between the WSOPLIVE stream, PKRGSSP and your list I guess I can skip the drive to Vegas next week. Your list is spot on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well crap, between the WSOPLIVE stream, PKRGSSP and your list I guess I can skip the drive to Vegas next week. Your list is spot on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Claims Service: FTP Anger Brewing by Rob C</title>
		<link>http://spartanfox.com/2011/05/16/claims-service-ftp-anger-brewing/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2011 09:07:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spartanfox.com/?p=118#comment-25</guid>
		<description>FTP definitely shot themselves in the foot. They must be using the same company for Public Relations that runs their CR / Email Support line.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FTP definitely shot themselves in the foot. They must be using the same company for Public Relations that runs their CR / Email Support line.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Pokerpocalypse 2011: So what can we do? by Jose Villadiego</title>
		<link>http://spartanfox.com/2011/04/18/pokerpocalypse-2011-so-what-can-we-do/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>Jose Villadiego</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2011 20:01:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spartanfox.com/?p=72#comment-15</guid>
		<description>Thank you very much for sharing your thoughts on the matter and for the recomendation. Im not on the US so I can still play but I was affected by bacl friday in some way. 

About the hashtag I think #pokerpanic is the best out there.

Villa</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you very much for sharing your thoughts on the matter and for the recomendation. Im not on the US so I can still play but I was affected by bacl friday in some way. </p>
<p>About the hashtag I think #pokerpanic is the best out there.</p>
<p>Villa</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Some (Attempt at) Sober Analysis Regarding Pokerpocalypse 2011 by Mark Gahagan</title>
		<link>http://spartanfox.com/2011/04/15/some-attempt-at-sober-analysis-regarding-pokerpocalypse-2011/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Gahagan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Apr 2011 19:18:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spartanfox.com/?p=48#comment-14</guid>
		<description>I dont think the argument entirely falls apart. Even if gambling charges are withdrawn and even if they didn&#039;t violate the UIGEA, what they did to make banks think the transactions were not coming from their site still constitutes bank fraud, irrespective of the other charges. They might not get as much out of this in that scenario, but I do feel the DoJ has plenty of arrows in the quiver to argue that poker is gambling anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dont think the argument entirely falls apart. Even if gambling charges are withdrawn and even if they didn&#8217;t violate the UIGEA, what they did to make banks think the transactions were not coming from their site still constitutes bank fraud, irrespective of the other charges. They might not get as much out of this in that scenario, but I do feel the DoJ has plenty of arrows in the quiver to argue that poker is gambling anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Some (Attempt at) Sober Analysis Regarding Pokerpocalypse 2011 by Seven Burke</title>
		<link>http://spartanfox.com/2011/04/15/some-attempt-at-sober-analysis-regarding-pokerpocalypse-2011/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>Seven Burke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Apr 2011 19:14:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spartanfox.com/?p=48#comment-13</guid>
		<description>Neat piece.  Slightly disagree with one point, however.

IF it is determined that poker does not fit the definition of  gambling (because of the skill element involved) then it seems the Govt&#039;s case basically falls apart - even the money laundering.  After all, you kind of need some kind of illegal activity on the other end; otherwise, spurious financial arrangements are just that - and out of the reach of DOJ.

Seems to hinge on whether poker fits the definition of gambling.

I like to compare poker to roulette.  When you put money on the roulette table, there is virtually zero skill involved in the outcome.  It is 100% chance.

By contrast, you don&#039;t even have to put up money to see your cards in poker (unless you&#039;re in the blinds - and if that&#039;s a problem, they could get rid of blinds).  Once you put money up to play a hand, the outcome of the hand is NOT determined entirely by chance.  

Big difference.

Marriage is a gamble.  I hate to think of the consequences if DOJ ever figures THAT out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neat piece.  Slightly disagree with one point, however.</p>
<p>IF it is determined that poker does not fit the definition of  gambling (because of the skill element involved) then it seems the Govt&#8217;s case basically falls apart &#8211; even the money laundering.  After all, you kind of need some kind of illegal activity on the other end; otherwise, spurious financial arrangements are just that &#8211; and out of the reach of DOJ.</p>
<p>Seems to hinge on whether poker fits the definition of gambling.</p>
<p>I like to compare poker to roulette.  When you put money on the roulette table, there is virtually zero skill involved in the outcome.  It is 100% chance.</p>
<p>By contrast, you don&#8217;t even have to put up money to see your cards in poker (unless you&#8217;re in the blinds &#8211; and if that&#8217;s a problem, they could get rid of blinds).  Once you put money up to play a hand, the outcome of the hand is NOT determined entirely by chance.  </p>
<p>Big difference.</p>
<p>Marriage is a gamble.  I hate to think of the consequences if DOJ ever figures THAT out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: spartanfox.com @ 2012-05-19 22:02:03 -->
